The Effect of Using Multimedia Blurb on L2 Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text

Main Article Content

Melissa Alma R. Orencia

Keywords

multimedia blurb, narrative reading, new literacies, reading comprehension, second language

Abstract

Strategies that improve reading comprehension is essential for learning. This study investigated the effect of Multimedia Blurb (MMB) on second language (L2) reading comprehension. Readers create a MMB using internet-based tools, and a specific language to express their understanding of the text read. Participants were drawn from intact secondary education pre-service teachers of varied majorships and assigned to three conditions. Two experimental groups produced a MMB, one used their first language (L1) which is Filipino, and the other applied their second language (L2), which is English. A control group did not create a MMB. All groups were tested for comprehension after reading and producing a MMB. A oneway between groups analysis of covariance determined the impact of MMB on comprehension. The experimental groups performed significantly better than the control group, with the L2 group generating the highest mean score. The digital tools utilized and the language used to process the narrative text likely enhanced readers comprehension. Further study of the MMB elements is recommended.
Abstract 860 | PDF Downloads 441

References

Adult Survey of Reading Attitude (n.d.) Retrieved from http://www.cedu.niu.edu/~smith/ASRA.pdf.

Apuleius, L. (n.d.). Cupid and psyche. Retrieved from http://www.pitt.edu/~dash/cupid.html.

Ary, D., Jacobs, L., Sorensen, C., & Walker, D. (2014). Introduction to research in education (9th ed.). Australia: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Boche, B., & Henning, M. (2015). Multimodal scaffolding in the secondary English classroom curriculum. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 58(7), 579-589. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jaal. 406/pdf.

Cambria, J., & Guthrie, J.T. (2010). Motivating and engaging students in reading. The NERA Journal, 46(1), 16-29. Retrieved from http://literacyconnects.org/img/2013/ 03/Motivating-and-engaging-students-in-readingCambria-Guthrie.pdf.

Coiro, J. (2003). Exploring literacy on the internet: Expanding our understanding of reading comprehension to encompass new literacies. The Reading Teacher 56(5), 458-464.

Guthrie, J., Klauda, S., & Ho, A.N. (2013). Modeling the relationships among reading instruction, motivation, engagement, and achievement for adolescents. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(1), 9-26. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/rrq. 035/epdf.

Hill, C. (2011). What can teachers do to improve reading comprehension? An examination of second language reading research and implications for English language teaching practices. The Arbutus Review, 2(1), 62-74.

Hittleman, D. (1988). Developmental reading, K-8.Teaching from a whole language perspective (3rd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill Publishing Co.

Ilustre, C. (2011). Beliefs about reading, metacognitive reading strategies, and text comprehension among college students in a private university. Philippine ESL Journal, 7, 28-47. Retrieved from http:// www.academia.edu/1839835/Beliefs_about_ Reading_Metacognitive_Reading_Strategies_and_ TextComprehens-ion_among_College_Students_ in_a_Private_University.

Imam, O.A., Mastura, M.A., Jamil, H., & Ismail, Z. (2014). Reading comprehension skills and performance in science among high school students in the Philippines. Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, 29, 81-94. Retrieved from http://apjee.usm.my/APJEE _29_2014/Art%205(81-94).pdf.

IndexMundi. (2017, July 9). Philippines literacy. Retrieved from http://www.indexmundi.com/philippines/literacy.html.

International Literacy Association (ILA). (n.d.). The problem. Why Literacy? Retrieved from https://www.literacyworldwide.org/why-literacy.

International Reading Association. (2001).Integrating literacy and technology in the curriculum [brochure]. Retrieved from https://www.literacyworldwide.org/docs/defaultsource/where-we-stand/technology-position-statement. pdf?sfvrsn=6.

Jiang, X. (2011). The role of first language literacy and second language proficiency in second language reading comprehension. The Reading Matrix, 11(2), 177-190. Retrieved from www.readingmatrix.com//articles/april_ 2011/jiang.pdf.

Leu, D., Kinzer, C., Coiro, J. & Cammack, D. (2004). Toward a theory of new literacies emerging from the internet and other information and communication technologies. In Alverman, D., Unrau, N. & Ruddell, R.B. (Eds.), Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading (5th ed.)., (pp. 1570-1613). Retrieved from http://www.readingonline. org/newliteracies/leu/.

Leu, D.J. Jr., Kinzer, C.K., Coiro, J., Castek, J., & Henry, L.A. (2013). New literacies: A dual-level Theory of the changing nature of literacy instruction and assessment. In Alvermann, D. E., Unrau, N. & Ruddell, R. (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (6th ed.), (pp. 1150-1181). Newark, DEL: IRA. Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu5797787/NewLiteracies_A_ Dual_Level_Theory_/of_the_Changing_Nature_of_ Literacy_ Instruction_and_Assessment.

Leu, D., Zawilinski, L., Forzani, E., & Timbrell, N. (2014). Best practices in teaching the new literacies of online research and comprehension. Retrieved from http://newliteracies.uconn.edu/wp-content/uploads/ sites/448/2014/07/Leu-D.J.-Zawilinski-L.-Forzani-E.TimbrellN.-in-press.pdf.

Luz, J.M. (2007). A nation of nonreaders. Retrieved from http://pcij.org/stories/a-nation-of-nonreaders/.

Malloy, J., & Gambrell, L. (2008). New insights on motivation in the literacy classroom. In Block, C. & Paris, S. (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based practices (2nded.), (pp. 226-237). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

Morrell, E. (2012). 21st-century literacies critical media pedagogies and language arts. The Reading Teacher, 66(4), 300-302. Retrieved from onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/ 10.1002/TRTR.../pdf.

Philippine Star (2010). How do Filipino students rate reading? Retrieved from http://www.philstar.com/health-andfamily/553720/how-do-filipino-students-rate-reading.

Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. (2000). American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. Retrieved from https:// home.ubalt.edu/tmitch/641/deci_ryan_2000.pdf.

Savage, J. (1994). Teaching reading using literature. Madison, WIS: WCB Brown and Benchmark Publishers.

Schiefele, U., Schaffner, E., Moller, J. & Wigfield, A. (2012). Dimensions of reading motivation and their relation to reading behavior and competence. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(4), 427-463.

Smith, M.C. (1991). An investigation of the construct validity of the Adult Survey of Reading Attitude. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the College Reading Association, Alexandria, VA. Retrieved from http://www.cedu. niu.edu/~smith/papers/asra.htm.

Text Readability Consensus Calculator. (n.d.) Retrieved from http://www.readabilityformulas.com/freetests/sixreadability-formulas.php.

UNESCO (2005). Towards knowledge societies. Paris, France: author. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001418/141843e.pdf.

UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS). (2016 September). 50th anniversary of International Literacy Day: literacy rates are on the rise but millions remain illiterate. Retrieved from http://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/ documents/fs38-50th-anniversary-of-international- literacy-day-literacy-rates-are-on-the-rise-but-millionsremain-illiterate-2016-en.pdf.