Exploring Vietnamese Students' Attitude Towards Project Works in Enhancing Autonomous Learning in English Speaking Class

Main Article Content

Truong Thi Thanh Canh

Keywords

autonomous learning, project works, students' attitude, education

Abstract

The study was conducted with two objectives: (1) to investigate students' attitude towards the use of project works (PWs) to enhance their autonomous learning in an English speaking class; and (2) to figure out to what extent students believe that using PW can enhance their autonomous learning. Involved in this study were 81 conveniently selected students from Vien Dong college, Vietnam. An open-ended questionnaire, semi-structured interview and class observation were employed as research instruments for the quantitative and qualitative data collection. Descriptive statistics as mean score (M) and percentages were used to analyze and explain the data. The results revealed that the students have positive attitudes towards project work implementation in an English speaking class that may have enhanced their autonomous learning. Nonetheless, using project works' evaluation as one of the criteria for course assessment is a controversial issue among these students. In addition, students' interest in utilizing information technology devices is remarked  as one of the significant findings in this study.

Abstract 548 | PDF Downloads 345

References

Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: skills for the future. Clearing House, 83(2), 39-43.

BIE (2015). Gold standard PBL: Project based teaching practices. Retreived June 12, 2016 from https://www.bie.org/object/document/gold_standard_pbl_project_based_teaching_practices.

DeLong, S. (2009). Teaching method to encourage independent learning and thinking. New York: United States Military Academy.

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education, New York:Touchstone.

Halonen, J. S. (2002). Classroom presence. In S.F. Davis & W. Buskist (Eds.), The teaching of psychology: Essays in honor of Wilbert. J. McKeachie and Charles L. (p.56). Mahwah, N.J.:Lawrence Erlbaum.

Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy and foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Little, D. (1991). Learner autonomy 1: Definitions, issues and problems. Dublin: Authentik.

McCarthy T.(2010). Integrating PBL into a traditional skills-based curriculum to foster learner autonomy: An action research. The Journal of Kanda University of International Studies, 1 (22), 221-244.

Nguyen C. T. (2014). How Vietnamese student adapt to a new educational environment when studying in Australian institutes? A case study at La Trobe University. VNU Journal of Science Education Research, 30(3), 1-11.

Nguyen, P. M., Terlouw C., & Pilot A. (2005) Cooperative learning vs Confucian heritage culture's collectivism: Confrontation to reveal some cultural conflicts and mismatch. Asia Europe Journal 3(3), 403 - 41.

Patrick F., Nathaniel C., Kurtis., & Matthew R. (2008). Project-based leanring activities for short-term intensive English programs. Asian EFL Journal, 1, 57-76.

Raveewan W., & Karnchanoke W. (2015). The investigation of students' attitudes toward project work in enhancing independent. Mediterranean Journal of Social Science, 6(5).

Smith, M. A. (2005). Autonomy and project-based language learning: Factors mediating autonomy in project-based CALL (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Retreived July 11, 2016 from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download-doi=10.1.1.84.4354&rep=rep1&type=pdf.

Tal, R. & Rishpi, O. (1998). Developing writing skills via newspaper production: AMAL-AMIT joint project. English Teachers' Journal, 52, 3-61.

Thanasoulas, D. (2000). What is learner autonomy and how can it be fostered? The Internet TESL Journal, 6(11).

Thomas, J.W. (2010). A review of research on PBL. Retreived from http://www.bobpearlman.org/BestPractices/PBL.Research.pdf.