Intergenerational Communication among Faculty and Students in Higher Education
Main Article Content
Keywords
Generation, higher education, intergenerational, multiple case study
Abstract
This research illustrated the dynamics of intergenerational communication between faculty and students in a Philippine university. Adopting a contextualized age-period-cohort model (APC), this multiple case study involves four cases of multigenerational faculty interactions with students. Faculty cases were first selected through purposeful maximal sampling before student participants were selected. Semi-structured individual interviews, online communication analysis, and qualitative surveys were used to obtain an in-depth understanding of the IG communication in each case, with emphasis on their purpose for communication, encoding, and decoding of the message. Within-case analyses provided rich description of each case and cross-case analysis generated lessons across cases. Findings show that age, cohort, and period, influence the online learning communications. Faculty and students are consciously adjusting their communication styles to what they perceive to be "acceptable" to convey meaning. However, perceptions of what is acceptable could be based on faulty assumptions. The paper recommends a shift from "student diversity" to "education diversity" to capture the full dynamics of generational diversity in the academe.
Publication History
Version of Record online: June 29, 2023
Manuscript accepted: June 30, 2023
Manuscript revised: June 29, 2023
Manuscript received: March 22, 2023
References
Bongco, R.T. (2020, December). Intergenerational relationship building among Filipino teachers: A grounded theory [Doctorate dissertation, Philippine Normal University Manila]. PNU Online Commons.
Boysen, P. I., Daste, L., & Northern, T. (2016). Multigenerational challenges and the future of graduate medical education. Ochsner Journal, 16(1), 1101-107; PMCID: PMC4795490.
Delelis, M. G., Talosig, G. C., Lardera, M. G., Sarmiento, S. J., & Macabadbad, R. C. (2018). E gadgets of generation X and millennials: Their social life. International Journal of Advanced Research in Management and Social Sciences, 7(2),78-94 ISSN: 2278-6236.
Devlin, T.M. (2018, January 17). Baby boomers and millennials: Are they even speaking the same language? Babbel Magazine. https://www.babbel.com/en/magazine/are-millennials-killing-language
Dickinson, A. (2017). Communicating with online student: The impact of e-mail tone on students performance and teacher evaluations. Journal of Educators Online, 14(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2017.14.2.5
Edwards, R., Bybee, B.T., Frost, J.K., Harvey, A.J., Navarro, M. (2017). That's not what I meant: How misunderstanding is related to channel and perspective-taking. Journal of Language of Social Psychology, 36(2), 188-210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X166629
Geeraerts, K., Vanhoof, J., & Van den Bossche, P. (2018). Teachers' intergenerational advice and information seeking: Content matters! Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 3(4), 256-271. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-11-2017-0026
Gonzalez-Flor, B.P. (2020), Talk to them, not at them: A Teacher-initiated model of engagement (TIME) in Online Learning. International Journal on Open and Distance e-Learning, 6(2), 13-26
Hernando-Malipot, M. (2021). 'There is no going back': CHED says flexible learning is here to stay. Manila Bulletin. https://mb.com.ph/2021/05/21/there-is-nogoing-back-ched-says-flexible-learning-is-here-tostay/
Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (2007, July- August). The next 20 years: How customer and workforce attitudes will evolve. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2007/07/the-next-20-years-how-customer-andworkforce-attitudes-will-evolve
Librero, A.F.D. (2020). Effects of culture on online engagement: The University of the Philippines Open University (UPOU) setting. International Journal on Open and Distance e-Learning, 6(2), 1-12
Lü, L., & Hu, J. (2021). Understanding teacher authority. Journal of Education and Development, 5(2), 44-52. https://doi.org/10.20849/jed.v5i2.916
Löfgren, K., Niemi, E., Mäkitalo-Siegl, K., Mekota, A.-M., Ojala, M., Fischer, F., Kahlert, J., Cernochova, M., Achterberg, F., Haak, E., Peltonen, A., Prokysek, M., & Heikkinen, P. (2013). Meeting the challenges of generational change in the teaching profession: Towards a European model for intergenerational teacher collaboration. Educational Research eJournal, 2(2), 107-119. https://doi.org/10.5838/erej.2013.22.03
Macapagal, M. E., Ofreneo, M. P., Montiel, C.J., & Nolasco, J.M. (2013). Social Psychology in the Philippine context. Ateneo De Manila University Press.
McCrindle, M. (2014). The ABC of XYZ. McCrindle Research Pty Ltd.
Mupinga, D., Nora, R.T., & Yaw, D.VC. (2006) The learning styles, expectations, and needs of online students. College Teaching, 54(1), 185-189 http://web.simmons.edu/~brady/CE/Reading%202.pdf
Nambiar, D. (2020). The impact of online learning during COVID-19: Students' and teachers' perspective. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 8(2), 783-793. https://doi.org/10.25215/0802.094
Novotný, P., & Brücknerová, K. (2014). Intergenerational learning among teachers: An interaction perspective. Studia paedagogica, 19(4), 45-79. https://doi.org/10.5817/SP2014-4-3
Ota, H., Giles, H., & Somera, L. P. (2007). Beliefs about intra- and intergenerational communication in Japan, the Philippines, and the United States: Implication for older adults' subjective well-being. Routledge: Communication Studies, 58(2), 173–188 https://doi.org/10.1080/10510970701341139
Pew Research Center. (2015, September 3). The whys and hows of generations research. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2015/09/03/the-whys-and-hows-of-generations-research/
Polat, S., & Kazak, E. (2015). Primary school teachers' views on intergenerational learning. EDAM. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 15(5), 1189-1203. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2015.5.2523
Salvosa, H., & Hechanova, M.R. (2020). Generational differences and implicit leadership schemas in the Philippine workforce. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 42(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-08-2018-0314
Sun, L., Tang, Y., & Zuo, W. (2020). Coronavirus pushes education online. Nature Materials, 19, 687. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-020-0678-8
Swist, T., Collin, P., McCormack, J., & Third, A. (2015). Social media and the wellbeing of children and young people: A literature review. Commissioner for Children and Young People, Western Australia. https://researchdirect.westernsydney.edu.au/islandora/object/uws:36407/
Tamme, V., & Siibak, A. (2012). Enhancing family cohesion through web-based communication: Analysis of online communication practices in Estonian families.
Observatorio (OBS*) Journal, Special issue, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.15847/obsOBS000581
Tay, A. (2011). Managing generational diversity at the workplace: expectations and perceptions of different generations of employees. African Journal of Business Management, 5(2), 249-255. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM10.335
Tengco-Pacquing, M. C., Bustamante, R. N., Cabanban, A. E., Cosare, M. M., & Gamez, V. C. (2019). Positive framing effect: A mixed method study on the buying behavior of Filipino Millennials. North American Journal of Psychology, 21(1), 151-164.
White, A., Storms, G., Malt, B. C., & Verheyen, S. (2018). Mind the generation gap: Differences between young and old in everyday lexical categories. Journal of Memory and Language, 98, 12-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2017.09.001
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.