Teaching Abstract Algebra Online

Main Article Content

Erminda C. Fortes

Keywords

instructional preparations, online learning environment, self-directed learning, education

Abstract

This research attempted to document the instructional plan  that a professor would have to apply in teaching Abstract  Algebra online using the descriptive case study design  to come up with a framework on online abstract algebra  teaching. The instructional preparations employed enabled  the researcher to determine: the students' background  knowledge of the content; the students' technical knowhow;  and the resources available in the online environment.  The Philippine Normal University - Learning Management  System (PNU -LMS), Smart Notebook and Microsoft  Power Point slides, and verbal discussions recorded on  Techsmith Camtasia Studio, were used to create interactive  asynchronous discussions. The students' outputs were used  to provide immediate feedback regarding the developed  materials and the discussions thereof. The following  conclusions were derived: 1) Preparing for an online  environment requires: planning the content; determining  the nature of the students; determining the students'  background knowledge of content and their technical  know-how; and determining the quality of available  resources; 2) The capacity of asynchronous discussions  could be enhanced by giving opportunities for interaction  between student and professor, student to student, and  student to content; and 3) Assessing students' performance  during and after the discussions, giving regular feedback,  and eliciting students' feedback on the accessibility of the  online class are some assessment techniques that an online  instructor may use. Consequently, these conclusions  served as basis for deriving a framework on online abstract  algebra teaching. It was recommended that an experiment on the effectiveness of the online teaching format in Abstract Algebra using the aforesaid framework be done.

Abstract 327 | PDF Downloads 359

References

The University of Queensland. (2010). Benefits of teaching online. Retrieved from https://itali.uq.edu.au/filething/get/4553/benefits.pdf.

Clark, R.C. & Mayer, R.E. (2008). E-learning and the Science of Instruction. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer. Designing and using a variety of assessments. Retrieved from http://sitemaker.umich.edu/keldenn/chapter_5__designing_and_using_assessments.

Eggen, P. & Kauchak, D. (2001). Strategies for teachers:Teaching content and thinking skills (4th Edition).Allyn and Bacon: Pearson Education Company.

Grasha, A. F. (1996). Teaching with style. Pittsburgh Alliance Publishers.

Grow, G. (1991). Teaching learners to be self-directed. Adult Education Quarterly.

Horton, W. (2006). E-learning by design. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.

Huang, H. (2000). Instructional technologies facilitating online courses. Educational Technology, 40(4), 41-46.

Instructional strategies for online courses. Retrieved from http://www.ion.uillinois.edu/resources/tutorials/pedagogy/instructionalstrategies.asp.

Kelly, M. Top 6 teachers tasks: What teachers do.Retrieved from http://712educators.about.com/od/teachingstrategies/tp/teaching_tasks.html.

Knowles, M., Holton & Swanson, R. (1998). The adult learner. Houston: Golf Publishing.

Pelz, B. (2004). Three principles of effective online pedagogy.Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 14(1), 103-116. Retrieved from https://www.ccri.edu/distancefaculty/pdfs/Online-Pedagogy-Pelz.pdf.

Planning and preparing for instruction. Retrieved from http://sitemaker.umich.edu/keldenn/chapter_4__planning_and_preparing_for_instruction.

Snyder, L. G. & Snyder, M. J. (2008). Teaching critical thinking and problem solving skills. The Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, L(2), 90-97. Retrieved from http://reforma.fen.uchile.cl/Papers/Teaching%20
Critical%20Thinking%20Skills%20and%20problem%20solving%20skills%20-%20Gueldenzoph,%20Snyder.pdf.

Stavredes, T. (2011). Effective online teaching: Foundationsand structure for student source. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.