Teaching Abstract Algebra Online
Main Article Content
Keywords
instructional preparations, online learning environment, self-directed learning, education
Abstract
This research attempted to document the instructional plan that a professor would have to apply in teaching Abstract Algebra online using the descriptive case study design to come up with a framework on online abstract algebra teaching. The instructional preparations employed enabled the researcher to determine: the students' background knowledge of the content; the students' technical knowhow; and the resources available in the online environment. The Philippine Normal University - Learning Management System (PNU -LMS), Smart Notebook and Microsoft Power Point slides, and verbal discussions recorded on Techsmith Camtasia Studio, were used to create interactive asynchronous discussions. The students' outputs were used to provide immediate feedback regarding the developed materials and the discussions thereof. The following conclusions were derived: 1) Preparing for an online environment requires: planning the content; determining the nature of the students; determining the students' background knowledge of content and their technical know-how; and determining the quality of available resources; 2) The capacity of asynchronous discussions could be enhanced by giving opportunities for interaction between student and professor, student to student, and student to content; and 3) Assessing students' performance during and after the discussions, giving regular feedback, and eliciting students' feedback on the accessibility of the online class are some assessment techniques that an online instructor may use. Consequently, these conclusions served as basis for deriving a framework on online abstract algebra teaching. It was recommended that an experiment on the effectiveness of the online teaching format in Abstract Algebra using the aforesaid framework be done.
References
Clark, R.C. & Mayer, R.E. (2008). E-learning and the Science of Instruction. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer. Designing and using a variety of assessments. Retrieved from http://sitemaker.umich.edu/keldenn/chapter_5__designing_and_using_assessments.
Eggen, P. & Kauchak, D. (2001). Strategies for teachers:Teaching content and thinking skills (4th Edition).Allyn and Bacon: Pearson Education Company.
Grasha, A. F. (1996). Teaching with style. Pittsburgh Alliance Publishers.
Grow, G. (1991). Teaching learners to be self-directed. Adult Education Quarterly.
Horton, W. (2006). E-learning by design. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
Huang, H. (2000). Instructional technologies facilitating online courses. Educational Technology, 40(4), 41-46.
Instructional strategies for online courses. Retrieved from http://www.ion.uillinois.edu/resources/tutorials/pedagogy/instructionalstrategies.asp.
Kelly, M. Top 6 teachers tasks: What teachers do.Retrieved from http://712educators.about.com/od/teachingstrategies/tp/teaching_tasks.html.
Knowles, M., Holton & Swanson, R. (1998). The adult learner. Houston: Golf Publishing.
Pelz, B. (2004). Three principles of effective online pedagogy.Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 14(1), 103-116. Retrieved from https://www.ccri.edu/distancefaculty/pdfs/Online-Pedagogy-Pelz.pdf.
Planning and preparing for instruction. Retrieved from http://sitemaker.umich.edu/keldenn/chapter_4__planning_and_preparing_for_instruction.
Snyder, L. G. & Snyder, M. J. (2008). Teaching critical thinking and problem solving skills. The Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, L(2), 90-97. Retrieved from http://reforma.fen.uchile.cl/Papers/Teaching%20
Critical%20Thinking%20Skills%20and%20problem%20solving%20skills%20-%20Gueldenzoph,%20Snyder.pdf.
Stavredes, T. (2011). Effective online teaching: Foundationsand structure for student source. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.