The Pathway Towards Intergroup Forgiveness

Main Article Content

Darwin C. Rungduin
Teresita T. Rungduin

Keywords

intergroup forgiveness, Intergroup transgression, education

Abstract

Intergroup transgression is a form of  relationship that highlights differences among groups.  One aspect of this is emphasizing further discrepancies  between behaviors of members of the ingroup and  outgroup, which may develop antagonistic behaviors  against one another. When intergroup characteristics  become more salient, ingroup similarities become more  evident as well (Turner, 2012) which will consequently  inflate the chance of advancing the intergroup conflict.  The common ingroup identity theory (Dovidio, 2012)  proposes that re-categorization can be an approach by  which this conflict can be resolved. This re-categorization  rests on the assumption that if a superordinate identity  will be identified, the ingroup and outgroup members  will behave positively towards one another. This study  made use of a 2 x 2 between sample design with the first  factor consisting of priming and with the second factor as  socio-historical experience. Sixty-nine (69) respondents  participated in the experiment who were divided into two  groups: those who experienced martial law (cohort group)  and those who did not (non-cohort group). ANOVA  results indicated that neither priming nor socio-historical  group did not differ with one another and therefore did  not affect the perceived intergroup transgression and  intergroup forgiveness. The findings validated, however, the theoretical assumption that intergroup forgiveness can be facilitated by one's subscription to an overarching identity.

Abstract 427 | PDF Downloads 275

References

Allemand, M. (2008). Age differences in forgivingness: The role of future time perspective. Journal of Research in Personality, 42 (5), 1137-1147.

Cehajic, S., & Brown, R. (2008). Forgive and Forget? Antecedents and Consequences of Intergroup Forgiveness in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Political Psychology, 29 (3), 351-367.

Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., & Saguy, T. (2007). Another view of “we”: Majority and minority group perspectives on a common ingroup identity. European Review of Social Psychology, 18 (1), 296-330.

Ellemers, N., & Haslam, A. (2012). Social Identity Theory. In P. A. Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins, Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 379-398). London: Sage Publications.

Enriquez, V. G. (1978). Kapwa: A core concept of Filipino Social Psychology. Philippine Social Sciences and Humanities Review, 42, 100-108.

Exline, J. J., Worthington, E. L., & Mccullough, M. E. (2003). Forgiveness and Justice: A Research Agenda. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7 (4), 337-348.

Gaetner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2012). The common ingroup identity model. In P. A. Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & T. Higgins, Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology (pp. 439-457). London: Sage Publisher.

Hamber, B. (2007). Forgiveness and reconciliation: Paradise lost or pragmatism? Peace and Conflcit: Journal of Peace Psychology, 13 (1), 115-125.

Hande, C. (n.d.). Philippine prospects after martial law. Foriegn Affairs , 1147-1168.

Higgins, T. (2000). Social cognition: Learning about what matters in the social world. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 3 ±39.

Ho, M. Y., & Fung, H. H. (2011). A dynamic process model of forgiveness: A cross-cultural perspective. Review of General Psychology, 15 (1), 77-84.

Kadiangandu, J. K., & Mullet, E. (2007). Intergroup Forgiveness : A Congolese Perspective. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 13 (1), 37-49.

Kira, I. A., Mountain, S., Lewandowski, L. A., Templin, T. N., & Mohanesh, J. (2009). The effects of post-retribution inter-group forgiveness : The case of Iraqi refugees. Peace and Conflict, 15, 385–413.

Linardatos, L., & Lydon, J. E. (2010). A Little Reminder Is All It Takes: The Effects of Priming and Relational Self-construal on Responses to Partner Transgressions. Self and Identity, 10, 85–100.

Montiel, C. J. (2002). Sociopolitical Forgiveness. Peace Review, 14 (3), 271-277.

Mullet, E., & Neto, F. (2009). Lay people's views on intergroup forgiveness. A Journal of Social Justice, 21 (4),457-463.

Neto, F., & Mullet, E. (2004). Personality, self-esteem, and self-construal as correlates of forgivingness. European Journal of Personality, 18 (1), 15-30.

Noor, M., Brown, R., Taggart, L., Fernandez, A., & Coen, S. (2010). Intergroup Identity Perceptions and their Implications for Intergroup Forgiveness Intergroup identity perceptions and their implications for intergroup forgiveness : The Common Ingroup Identity Model and its efficacy in the field. The Irish Journal of Psychology, 31 (3-4), 151-170.

Ortiz, W. (2008). Fictionalized history in the Philippines: Five narratives of collective amnesia. Children's Literature in Education, 39, 269-280.

Paz, R., Neto, F., & Mullet, E. (2008). Forgiveness: A China–Western Europe Comparison. Journal of Psychology, 142 (2), 147–157.

Philpot, C. R., & Hornsey, M. J. (2011). Memory for intergroup apologies and its relationship with forgiveness. European Journal of Social Psychology,40 (1), 96-106.

Riek, B. M., Mania, E. W., Gaertner, S. L., McDonald, S. A., & Lamoreaux, M. J. (2010). Does a common ingroup identity reduce intergroup threat? Group Processes Intergroup Relations, 13 (4), 403-423.

Runguin, D. C. (2012). Forgiveness in the context of kapwa. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of Pambansang Samahan sa Sikolohiyang Pilipino. Batangas City, Philippines.

Wohl, M. J., & Branscombe, N. R. (2006). Wohl, M. J. A., & Branscombe, N. R. (n.d.). Collective guilt: Emotional reactions when one ' s group has done wrong or been wronged, (February 2013), 37–41. European Review of Social Psychology, 17 (1), 1-37.