Teaching Social and Emotional Skills to Students in Vietnam: Challenges and Opportunities
Keywords:
Social-emotional learning (SEL), Emotion identification, EmpathyAbstract
This study explores the challenges and opportunities of teaching social-emotional skills in classroomsettings in Vietnam. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with middle school students and teachers involved in the Ephata Summer Program in Ho Chi Minh city. This program promotes on social-emotional learning in primary and secondary school students. In this study, we focus on learning about emotion and empathy, important aspects of social- emotional learning (SEL). The results indicate that students and teachers have been recognized the importance and helpfulness of social-emotional learning taught in school settings. However, student's assessment of their empathy was relatively low. They realized that there were difficulties and obstacles from themselves and others, and proposed their own ways to overcome it. The findings add to the growing empirical evidence regarding the critical role of SEL in student's social life and academics in non-occidental social and cultural country, and the needs to implement it in school curricula.
References
Brandt, R. S. (1999). Successful implementation of SEL programs: Lessons from the thinking skills movement. In J. Cohen (Ed.), Educating hearts and minds: Social emotional learning and the passage into adolescence. 173-183. New York: Teachers College Press.
Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Selfdiscipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance in adolescents. Psychological Science, 16, 939-944.
Duckworth, A. L., & Carlson, S. M. (2013). Selfregulation and school success. In B. W. Sokol, F. M. E. Grouzet, & U. Müller (Eds.), Self-regulation and autonomy: Social and developmental dimensions of human conduct (pp. 208-230). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Durlak, J.A., Weissberg, R.P., Dymnicki, A.B., Taylor, R.D., & Schellinger, K.B. (2011). Enhancing students' social and emotional learning promotes success in school: Result of a meta-analysis. Child Development, 82,405-432.
Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., & Pachan, M. (2010). A meta-analysis of after-school programs that seek to promote personal and social skills in children and adolescents. American Journal of Community Psychology, 45, 294-309; doi: 10.1007/s10464-010-9300-6.
Elias, M. J., Zins, J. E., Weissberg, R. P., Frey, K. S., Greenberg, M. T., Haynes, N. M., et al. (1997). Promoting social and emotional learning: Guidelines for educators. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Erwin J. (2010). Inspiring the Best in Students. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development: Virginia.
Farrington et al. (2012), Teaching Adolescents to Become Learners. The Role of Noncognitive Factors in Shaping School Performance: A Critical Literature Review. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago School Research.
Gardner, H. (1993). The Multiple Intelligences: ThenTheory in Practice. New York: Basic Books.
Goleman D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. New York: Bantam Books.
Goleman D. (2006). Social intelligence: The revolutionary new science of human relationships. New York: Bantam Books.
Grazzini C. (1996). The Four Planes of Development. The NAMTA Journal, 21:2, 27-61.
Greenberg, M. T., Weissberg, R. P., O'Brien, M. T., Zins, J. E., Fredericks, L., Resnik, H., et al. (2003). Enhancing schoolbased prevention and youth development through coordinated social, emotional, and academic learning. American Psychologist, 58, 466-474.
Hawkins, J. D., Smith, B. H., & Catalano, R. F. (2004). Social development and social and emotional learning. In J. E. Zins, R. P. Weissberg, M. C. Wang, & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Building academic success on social and emotional learning: What does the research say? (pp. 135-150). New York: Teachers College Press.
Joseph, G. E., & Strain, P. S. (2003). Comprehensive evidence-based social-emotional curricula for young children: An analysis of efficacious adoption potential. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 23(2), 65-76.
Marzano, R., Pickering, D., & Pollock, J. (2001). Classroom Instruction that Works. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Payton, J., Weissberg, R. P., Durlak, J. A., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., Schellinger, K. B., & Pachan, M. (2008). The positive impact of social and emotional learning for kindergarten to eighth-grade students: Findings from three scientifi c studies. Chicago: Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL). Retrieved from www.casel.org.
Perricone, J. (2005). Zen and the art of public school teaching. Frederick, MD: PublishAmerica.
Pietkiewicz I., & Smith J. (2014). A practical guide to using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis in qualitative research psychology. Czasopismo Psychologiczne - Psychological Journal, 20, 1, 7-14.
Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2002). Handbook of selfdetermination research. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
Wang, M. C., Haertel, G. D., & Walberg, H. J. (1997). Toward a knowledge base for school learning Review of Educational Research, 63, 249-294.
Weissberg, R. P., Caplan, M. Z., & Sivo, P. J. (1989). A new conceptual framework for establishing school-based social competence promotion programs. In L. A. Bond & B. E. Compas (Eds.). Primary prevention and promotion in the schools, 255-296. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Zins, J.E., & Elias, M.J. (2006). Social and emotional learning. In G.G. Bear & K.M. Minke (Eds.), Children's needs III: Development, prevention, and intervention (pp. 1-14). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologist.
![](http://po.pnuresearchportal.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Scopus®_151_JPG.jpg")
