Sulyap sa Buhay ng mga Gurong Nagtuturo ng Filipino bilang Out-of-field: Isang Penomenolohikal na Pagsusuri (A Glimpse into the Lives of Teachers Teaching Filipino Out-of-field: A Phenomenological Analysis)
Main Article Content
Keywords
Filipino, karanasan, out-of-field, penomenolohikal, experience, phenomenological
Abstract
This study aimed to analyze and describe the lived experiences of out-of-field teachers in Filipino. It utilized the Husserlian Descriptive Phenomenology and Colaizzi‘s Seven Steps of Data analysis to describe and explore the lived experience of the out-of-field teachers in Filipino. There were five out-of-field teachers who participated in this study who were chosen purposively. Analysis of the qualitative data resulted to four clustered themes: against the will, obstacles in learning, ways of adapting the challenge and benefits in out-of-field teaching. This result of the study implied that teachers who were in this kind of teaching encountered both positive and negative experiences. Thus, it is suggested that supervisors of the different schools must have corresponding policy in their recruitment process related to out-of-field teaching. Seminars and proper monitoring may also be provided to all teachers who are in this situation.
Abstrak
Nilayon ng pag-aaral na ito na masuri at mailarawan ang karanasan ng mga gurong nagtuturo ng Filipino bilang out-of-field. Ginamit sa pag-aaral ang Husserlian Descriptive Phenomenology at Colaizzi's Seven Steps of Data analysis sa paglalarawan at pagsusuri sa karanasan ng mga gurong out-of-field sa Filipino. Binubuo ng limang gurong nagtuturo ng Filipino bilang out-of-field ang pinili gamit ang purposive sampling. Apat ang natuklasang klaster na tema sa pag-aaral na ito: labag sa kalooban, balakid sa pagtuturo, paraan sa paglagpas ng hamon, at benepisyo sa pagtuturong out-of-field. Ipinahiwatig sa kinalabasan ng pag-aaral na ito na ang karanasan ng mga gurong nasa out-of-field ay pinaghalong positibo at negatibo. Kaya, inirekomenda nito na ang mga namamahala sa mga paaralan ay magkaroon ng polisiya sa recruitment process na may kaugnayan sa pagtuturong outof-field. Kailangang mabigyan rin ang mga gurong nasa ganitong posisyon ng angkop na seminar o pagsasanay at monitoring.
References
Black, D. M. K. (2010). Business statistics for contemporary. Wiley.
Christenbury, L. (2011). The flexible teacher. Educational Leadership, 68(4), 46-50.
Clotfelter, C.T., Ladd, H.F., & Vigdor, J.L. (2010). Teacher credentials and student achievement in high school: A Cross subject analysis with student fixed effects. Journal of Human Resources, 45(3), 655-681.
Colaizzi, P. F. (1978). Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). Teacher education and the American future. Journal of teacher education, 61(1-2), 35-47.
DepEd. (2013). Our Department of Education Vision, Mission and Core Values (DepEd VMV). DepEd Order no. 36 series of 2013.
Donaldson, M. L., & Johnson, S. M. (2010). The price of misassignment: The role of teaching assignments in Teach for America teachers’ exit from low-income schools and the teaching profession. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32(2), 299–323.
Du Plessis, A. E., Carroll, A., & Gillies, R. M. (2017). The meaning of out-of-field teaching for educational leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 20(1), 87-112.
Du Plessis, A. E. (2018). The lived experience of out-of-field STEM teachers, a quandary for strategising quality teaching in STEM?. Research in Science Education, 1-35.
Goodwin, A. L. (2010). Globalization and the preparation of quality teachers: Rethinking knowledge domains for teaching. Teaching Education, 21(1), 19-32.
Groundwater-Smith, S., Ewing, R., & Le Cornu, R. (2011). Teaching challenges and dilemmas. South Melbourne: Cengage Learning Australia.
Hobbs, L. (2012). Teaching out-of-field: Factors shaping identities of secondary science and mathematics. Teaching Science: The Journal of the Australian Science Teachers Association, 58(1).
Hobbs, L. (2015). Too many teachers teaching outside their area of expertise. The Conversation, 13.
Ho, C. (2014). The importance of effective communication. Research Within. Retrieved from http://singteach.nie.edu.sg/issue50-people/.
Ingersoll, R. M. (2019). Measuring out-of-field teaching. (pp. 21-52). Examining the Phenomenon of "Teaching Out-of-Field:" International Perspectives on Teaching as a Non-specialist. Singapore: Springer.
Johnson, B. (2015). "Creative teacher" is not an oxymoron. Edutopia.
Kelly, M. (2016). Topkeys to being a successful teacher. Retrieved from http://712educators.about.com/od/teachingstrategies/tp/sixkeys.html.
Kim, E. G. (2011). Out-of-field secondary school teachers in Korea: Their realities and implications. KEDI Journal of Educational Policy, 8(1).
Kola, A. J., & Sunday, O. S. (2015). A review of teacher self-efficacy, pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) and out-of-field teaching: Focussing on Nigerian teachers. International Journal of Elementary Education, 4(3), 80-85.
Malek, M. A., & Mishra, L. (2016). Quality assurance in teacher education. International Journal of Peace, Education and Development, 4(1), 25-29.
McInerney, D. M. (2013). Educational psychology: Constructing learning. Pearson Higher Education AU.
Pacana, N. M. S. et. al. (2019). Out-of-Field Social Studies teaching through sustainable culture-based pedagogy: A Filipino perspective. International Journal of Education and Practice, 7(3), 230-241.
Pereira, H. R. (2012). Rigour in phenomenological research: Reflections of a novice nurse researcher. Nurse researcher, 19(3).
Ponsaran, C. (2017). Changing shifts, changing tasks: How flexible Are Filipino outsourcing staff?, Philippines: Rethink Staffing, Blog, Ilo-ilo. pp: 1.
Porsch, R., & H. Wendt, (2015). Social and science education by primary school teachers who majored in Biology versus a different subject. ECER Conference.
Ramsay, M. C. (2013). Out-of-field teacher credentials 2010–2012.
Sambe, M. (2015). Out-of-field teaching. The African perspective.
Tan, T. K., Sheng, Y. Z., & Ramos, C. (2016) Testing on the theory of education mismatch: evidence from PIAAC for twenty countries.
Weldon, P. R. (2015). The teacher workforce in Australia: Supply, demand and data issues. Camberwell VIC: Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER).
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.