A CONTENT-BASED READABILITY FORMULA FOR FILIPINO TEXTS

Main Article Content

Heidi B. Macahilig

Keywords

readability, readability formula, Filipino texts, education

Abstract

Several well-known formulas for measuring readability of texts have been developed for use particularly in assessing English texts. For assessing texts in other languages, these formulas were found inadequate or even inappropriate primarily because of the differences in the syntactic structure and lexical nature between and among languages. Thus, some countries have adapted or developed their own formulas to assess reading texts in their respective languages. To date, there is no known formula being widely used to establish the readability of Filipino texts.

This study attempted to develop a readability formula that can be used as the standard in determining the readability levels of Filipino academic books required in the different content area subjects, from Kinder to fourth year high school, that use Filipino as the medium of instruction.
Abstract 1642 | PDF Downloads 1230

References

Anderson, J. (1983). Lix and Rix: Variations on a little known readability index. Journal of Reading, 26.

Bjornsson, C.H. 1968. Lasbarhet. Stockholm: Liber

Bormuth, J. R. (1966). Readability: A new approach. Reading Research Quarterly,1(3).

Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction, Cambridge, Mass.: Belkapp Press.

Bruner, J. (1986). Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Caylor, J., Sticht, T., & Ford J.P. (1973). The FORCAST Readability formula. Literacy Discussion. International Institute for Adult Literacy: UNESCO.

Chall, J. (1958). Readability: An appraisal of research and application. Columbus OH: Bureau of Educational Research, The Ohio State University.

Chall, J., Bissex, G., Conrad, S. & Harris-Sharples, S. (1996). Holistic assessment of texts, scales for estimating the difficulty of Literature, Social Studies and Science materials. Cambridge MA: Brookline.

Chall, J.S. & Dale E. (1995). Manual for the New Dale-Chall Readability Formula. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books

Dale, E. & Chall, J. (1949). The concept of readability. Elementary English, 26(23).

Dale, E. & Chall, J. (1948). A Formula for Predicting Readability. Educational Research Bulletin. Ohio State University. 27

DuBay, W.H. (2006). Smart language: Readers, readability, and the grading of text. Costa Mesa: Impact Information.

Fry, E.B. (1977). Fry's Readability Graph: Clarifications, validity, and extensions to level 17. Journal of Reading, 21

Fry, E. (2006). Readability. Chapter for Reading Hall of Fame Book. Retrieved from http://www.siuvoss.net/fryreadability.pdf.

Fry, E. B. (2001). Readability. In Literacy in America: An Encyclopedia. Edited by B. Guzzetti. Denver, CO: ABC-CLIO

Fry, E. B. (1989). Legal aspects of readability. ERIC System No. ED 322 489.

Gray, W.S. & Leary, B. (1935). What makes a book readable. University of Chicago

Flesch, R. F. (1948). A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32

Gunning, T. G. (2003). Building Literacy in the Content Areas. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Gunning, T.G. (1998). Best books for beginning readers. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Harris, A.J. & Sipay, E. (1985). How to Increase Reading Ability (8th Ed). New York & London: Longman

Kincaid, J.P., Fishbume, Jr, R., Rogers, R., & Chissom, B. (1975). Derivation of new Readability Formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count and Flesch Reading Ease Formula) for Navy Enlisted Personnel. Retrieved from http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/ a006655.pdf

Kouame, J.B. (2010). Using readability tests to improve the accuracy of evaluation documents intended for low-literate participants. Journal of Multi Disciplinary Evaluation, 6(14).

Liau, T., Bassin, C., Martin C.J. & Coleman, E.B. (1976). Modification of the Coleman Readability Formulas. Journal of Literacy Research, 8. Retrieved from http://jlr.sagepub.com/content/8/4/381.

McLaughlin, G.H.(1969). SMOG grading-a new readability formula. Journal of Reading, 22. 2009 Ortograpiya ng Filipino: KWF .

Oyzon, V. & Fullmer, J. M. (2012). MTBMLE initiatives In Region 8. Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/2520341/MTBMLE_Initiatives_in_Region_8.

Powers, R. D., Sumner, W. A., & Kearl, B. E. (1958). A recalculation of four adult readability formulas. Journal of Educational Psychology, 49(2).

Santiago, A. O. & Tiangco, N. G. (2003), Makabagong Balarilang Filipino (2nd Ed.), Sta. Mesa Heights, Lungsod ng Quezon: Rex Book Store, Inc.

Stenner, A. J., Horabin, I., Smith, D.R. & Smith, R. (1988). The Lexile Framework. Durham, NC: Metametrics.

School Renaissance Institute (2000). The ATOS readability formula for books and how it compares to other formulas. Madison, WI: School Renaissance Institute, Inc.

Talisayon, V. M. (1983). A Feedback-based Readability Formula for Science and Mathematics Curriculum Materials. Science Education Center: University of the Philippines

Villamin, A. M. & de Guzman, E.S. (1979). Pilipino Readability Formula: The derivation of a readability formula and a Pilipino word list. Language Study Center: Philippine Normal University

Waray Readability Formula. Retrieved from http://waraylanguage.org/page.php?id=about

Wikahon. Retrieved from http://adarna.com.ph/ wikahon/