THE SUITABILITY OF THE FRY AND SMOG READABILITY FORMULAE IN DETERMINING THE READABILITY OF FILIPINO TEXTS
Main Article Content
Keywords
readability, Fry readability formula, SMOG, education
Abstract
The descriptive quantitative study evaluates English and Filipino passages by subjecting them to two readability formulae to determine the difficulty level and suitability of the texts to the intended reader level. The evaluation results show that among all the passages taken from the English textbooks, only 6.01% and 8.41% matched the target level based on Fry and SMOG (Simple Measure of Gobbledygook) formulae respectively. The majority of the passages in English did not get any results; thus rated as invalid. The SMOG evaluation showed that the majority of the passages rose higher by two or more levels than the intended reader level. Meanwhile, among all the Filipino passages evaluated, none matched the intended level; the majority was rated invalid, and many did not show any result based on the Fry readability formula. The SMOG evaluation showed that the majority of the passages stood higher by six to ten levels than the intended reader level. Results suggest that the existing readability formulae may not be applicable to passages in Filipino and Philippine English, and this calls for the development of a readability formula for Filipino texts in both languages.
References
Bernhardt, E. (1998). Reading development in a second language:
theoretical, empirical, and classroom perspectives. New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Chall, J. & Dale, E. (1995). Manual for the new dale-chall readability formula. Cambridge: Brookline Books.
Farstrup, A. and Samuels, S. (2002). What research has to say about reading instruction. Delaware: International Reading Association.
Gunning, T. ( 2005). Creating literacy instruction for all students. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
Harris, T. & Hodges R. (1995). The Literacy dictionary: the vocabulary of reading and writing. Delaware: International Reading Association.
Harrison, C. (1980). Readability in the classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hermosa, N. (2002). The Psychology of reading. Quezon City: UP Open University.
McKenna, M & Stahl, K. (2009). Assessment for reading instruction. New York: The Guilford Press.
Lapp, D., Flood, J. & Farnan, N. (2008). Content area reading and learning: instructional strategies. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Tompkins, G. (2001). Literacy for the 21st century. New Jersey: Practice-Hall, Inc. Waples, et al. 1940.
Zakaluk, B. and Samuels, S. (1990). Readability: its past, present, & future. Delaware: International Reading Association.
theoretical, empirical, and classroom perspectives. New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Chall, J. & Dale, E. (1995). Manual for the new dale-chall readability formula. Cambridge: Brookline Books.
Farstrup, A. and Samuels, S. (2002). What research has to say about reading instruction. Delaware: International Reading Association.
Gunning, T. ( 2005). Creating literacy instruction for all students. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
Harris, T. & Hodges R. (1995). The Literacy dictionary: the vocabulary of reading and writing. Delaware: International Reading Association.
Harrison, C. (1980). Readability in the classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hermosa, N. (2002). The Psychology of reading. Quezon City: UP Open University.
McKenna, M & Stahl, K. (2009). Assessment for reading instruction. New York: The Guilford Press.
Lapp, D., Flood, J. & Farnan, N. (2008). Content area reading and learning: instructional strategies. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Tompkins, G. (2001). Literacy for the 21st century. New Jersey: Practice-Hall, Inc. Waples, et al. 1940.
Zakaluk, B. and Samuels, S. (1990). Readability: its past, present, & future. Delaware: International Reading Association.
Article Sidebar
Published
Oct 8, 2015
Article Details
How to Cite
Gutierrez, M. R. M. (2015). THE SUITABILITY OF THE FRY AND SMOG READABILITY FORMULAE IN DETERMINING THE READABILITY OF FILIPINO TEXTS. The Normal Lights, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.56278/tnl.v8i1.32
Section
Research Article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.