Using Collaborative Formative Assessments in Enhancing Students' Understanding of Concepts in Grade 9 Electron Configuration
Main Article Content
Keywords
Formative assessment, science learning, collaborative learning, Philippine K to 12 curriculum, education
Abstract
This action research focuses on the use of collaborative formative assessment in learning about electron configuration in a Grade 9 science classroom. It aimed to examine how students do formative assessments as they collaborate in groups and to determine if the use of collaborative formative assessment tasks promotes learning. After each lesson, the students were grouped and were given teacher-made formative assessment tasks on the topics quantum numbers and electron configuration to accomplish. Observations, interviews, worksheets, survey, and an objective performance test were used to gather data from the students. The findings indicate that the students like the use of collaborative formative assessment and central to their experience is the presence of peer feedback and support which they reported were useful to promote learning. While the findings also indicate that some students experience social loafing during collaborative work, the use of collaborative formative assessment encouraged sharing of ideas and immediate feedback. Based on the findings, the researchers recommend the use of collaborative formative assessments as an innovative approach of assessment that can promote conceptual understanding in Grade 9 Science classrooms.
References
Brown, F. (2015) . Collaborative learning in the EAP classroom: Students' perceptions. Retrieved from www.espworld.info/Articles_17/PDF/Collaborative%20learning.pdf.
Heritage, M. (2011). Formative assessment: An enabler of learning better: Evidenced-based education. Spring 2011. 18-19. Retrieved from http://www.amplify.com/assets/regional/Heritage_FA.pdf.
Hargreaves, E. (2007). The validity of collaborative assessment for learning. Assessment in Education. 14(2). 1-14.
Swan, K., Shen, J. & Hiltz, S. R. (2006). Assessment and collaboration in online learning. JALN 10(1). 45-62.
Gulikers, J., Biemans, H. J. A., Wesselink, R., & Vander Wel, M. (1995). Aligning formative and summative assessments: A collaborative action research challenging teacher conceptions. Studies in Educational Evaluation. 39. 116-124.
Van Boxtel, C., Van der Linden, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2000). Collaborative learning tasks and the elaboration of conceptual knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 10(4), 311–330.
Lai, E. R. (2011). Collaboration: A literature review research report. Retrieved from: http://www.pearsonassessments.com/.
Perron, B. E. (2011). Reducing social loafing in group-based projects. College Teaching. 59. 163-164.
Rich, J. D., Owens, D., Johnson, S., Mines, D., & Capote, K. (2014). Some strategies for reducing social loafing in group projects. Global Journal of Human Social Science A. 14(5).
Heritage, M. (2011). Formative assessment: An enabler of learning better: Evidenced-based education. Spring 2011. 18-19. Retrieved from http://www.amplify.com/assets/regional/Heritage_FA.pdf.
Hargreaves, E. (2007). The validity of collaborative assessment for learning. Assessment in Education. 14(2). 1-14.
Swan, K., Shen, J. & Hiltz, S. R. (2006). Assessment and collaboration in online learning. JALN 10(1). 45-62.
Gulikers, J., Biemans, H. J. A., Wesselink, R., & Vander Wel, M. (1995). Aligning formative and summative assessments: A collaborative action research challenging teacher conceptions. Studies in Educational Evaluation. 39. 116-124.
Van Boxtel, C., Van der Linden, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2000). Collaborative learning tasks and the elaboration of conceptual knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 10(4), 311–330.
Lai, E. R. (2011). Collaboration: A literature review research report. Retrieved from: http://www.pearsonassessments.com/.
Perron, B. E. (2011). Reducing social loafing in group-based projects. College Teaching. 59. 163-164.
Rich, J. D., Owens, D., Johnson, S., Mines, D., & Capote, K. (2014). Some strategies for reducing social loafing in group projects. Global Journal of Human Social Science A. 14(5).