Initial Validation of the Chemistry MicroLab Kit (Chem. μLab Kit) in Facilitating Learning of Selected Chemistry Concepts for K-12 Science

Main Article Content

Crist John M. Pastor
Fidela Q. Aranes
Janir T. Datukan
Virgil Duad
Jose Paolo O. Bantang
Allen A. Espinosa
Nelson Garcia
Arlyne C. Marasigan
Vic Marie I. Camacho
Adolfo P. Roque
Rebecca C. Nueva España
Ruel A. Avilla
Crisanta A. Ocampo

Keywords

Cost effective, Environmental awareness, Microlab, Microscale chemistry, education

Abstract

The introduction of the Chemistry  MicroLab Kit (CμLK) aims to assist student learning of  chemistry in a more interactive and practical way. Each  kit was designed to address certain topics in chemistry that  may otherwise be too abstract to do in a lecture-discussion  set up. Among the many topics tackled in secondary  school, 13 undergraduate students were hand- picked for  this preliminary study. The test subjects for this initial  phase of the research both majors and non-majors, were  currently enrolled in a Chemistry course. It was also triedout at the Institute for Teaching and Learning (formerly Center for Teaching and Learning) with selected third year students. In this preliminary study, the students found three activities to be interesting and well-balanced: Gas Laws in a Box, Particulate Nature of Matter, and Solution Rules. In assessing the activities, they highly rated the easy language used for understanding the procedures, followed by setup of the experiments and a step-by-step presentation of the procedures. Initial results of the study find it a promising addition to the secondary level chemistry activities because CμLK enhances students' attitudes and motivation toward chemistry laboratory work.

Abstract 381 | PDF Downloads 256

References

Abdullah, M., Mohamed, N. & Ismail, Z.H. (2009). The effect of microscale chemistry experimentation on students' attitude and motivation towards chemistry practical work. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 30(2), 44-72.

Breuer, S.W. (2004). Teaching practical organic chemistry the microscale way. Chemical Education Journal, 7(2), 17-18.

Buther, S.S., Mayo, D.W., Pike, R.M., Foote, C.M., Hotham, J.R., & Page, D.S. (1985). Microscale organic laboratory: I: An approach to improving air quality in instructional laboratories. Journal of Chemical Education, 62(2), 147.

Chloupeck-McGough, M (1989). Organic laboratory experiments: Micro vs. conventional. Journal of Chemical Education, 66(1), 92.

Ibanez, J.G. (2011). An Introduction to Microscale Chemistry in Latin America. European Chemistry & Chemical Engineering Education Network NewsLetter, 12(10), 1-8.

Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Mafumiko, F.M.S. (2008). The Potential of Micro-scale Chemistry Experimentation in Enhancing Teaching and Learning of Secondary Chemistry: Experiences from Tanzania Classrooms. Journal of International Educational Cooperation, 3, 63-79.

Narmadha, U. & Chamundeswari, S. (2013). Attitude towards Learning of Science and Academic Achievement in Science among Students at the Secondary Level. Journal of Sociological Research,4(2), 114-124.

Nasr, A. R., & Soltani, A.(2011). Attitude towards Biology and Its Effects on Student's Achievement. International Journal of Biology 3(4), 100-104.

Pickering, M., & LaPrade, J.E. (1986). Macro versus microlab: A controlled study of time effi ciency. Journal of Chemical Education, 63(6), 535-536.

Szafran, Z., Singh, M.M. & Pike, R.M. (1989). The microscale inorganic laboratory: Safety, economy, and versatility. Journal of Chemical Education, 66(11), A263-A264.

http://www.microscale.org