Proficiency of Sophomore English Majors on the Pronunciation of the Structural Variants of “Read” towards Improved Oral Performance

Main Article Content

Arsenia S. Allam

Keywords

accuracy, acquisition, form-focused instruction, grammar instruction, oral proficiency

Abstract

The first language speakers of English (L1) who have naturally and informally acquired the language may not find the “read” variants complicated. Speakers who acquired English as a second language (L2) may not also be bothered in the oral variants of this word as “rid” or “red” as they don't usually utter the word many times. But will it make a difference if this problem is addressed to other L2 speakers who are taking up English as their major area of specialization? This study conducted in one of the tertiary institutions in the Philippines attempts to report results of the classroom-based and a pre-experimental research with 49 Sophomore English majors as the participants. The results reveal unfavorable performance of the participant in their initial oral test on the variants of “read.” After exposure to the remedial grammar instruction, their awareness, knowledge on the shifting rules, and oral execution of the verb under study are enhanced as shown by the gained difference between the pre and post tests. It is imperative that L2 speakers of English particularly the English majors need to manifest proficiency in the oral variants of “read” since these are proofs of their grammatical competence, an essential component in a communicative curriculum.

Abstract 556 | PDF Downloads 324

References

Anderson, Lorin W. & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: a Revision of Bloom's taxonomy. New York. Longman Publishing. Retrieved from: http://www.kurwongbss.qld.edu.au/thinking/Bloom/blooms.htm.

Barcelon, E. (2015, June 18). Filipino problems in English Grammar: Manila Bulletin. Retrieved 15 2016, February, from Manila Bulletin: http://www.mb.com.ph/filipino-problems-in-english-.

Batko, A. (2004). When bad grammar happens to good people. New Jersey: Book-mart Press. Retrieved 15/02/16 from http://www.scoalastefancelmarefocsani.ro/engleza/teacher.

Bergsleithmer, J.M. (2006) Does grammar teaching and feedback promote EFL learning? Seoul, Korea: The Korea TESOL Journal. 9-1.

Bilash, O. (2011). Improving Second Language Education. http://www.educ.ualberta.ca/staff/olenka.bilash/best%20of%20bilash/automaticity.htm.

Bitchener, J., Young.S., & Cameron D. (2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback or ESL. Student writing. Journal Second Language Writing.

Brinton, D. (2006). The use of media in language teaching. Singapore: Thomson Learning Asia.

Brown, D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching. USA: Longman, Inc.

Burkart, G.S. (2004). Spoken language: What is and how to teach it. Washington, DC: The National Capital Language Resource Center.

Canilao, Ma. L. E. & de Jesus F. (2011). Best practices in language and literature teaching. Acelt Journal, 29-37. Q.C., Philippines.

Chih, H.H. (2013). Revisiting causes of grammatical errors for ESL teachers. Retrieved 15/02/16 from http://www.interesjournals.org/full-articles/revisiting-causesof_grammatical-errors-for-esl-teachers.pdf.

Diaz-Rico, L.T. & Weed, K.Z. (2010). The Cross Cultural, Language and Academic Development Handbook: A Complete K-12 Reference Guide. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Ellis, R. (1997). SLA research and Language teaching . Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ellis., (2006). Grammar meaning. In J.C. Beal, English in Modern Times. Sheffield University, U.K.: Oxford University Press Inc. http://www.arnoldpublisher.com.

Fotos, S. (2006). Cognitive approaches to grammar institution. Singapore: Heinle & Heinle.

Frankin, V; Rodman, R., & Hyams, N. (2010). Introduction to linguistics. Singapore: Cengage Learning Asia.

Gugin, D. (2014). A paragraph first approach to the teaching of academic writing, English Teaching Forum 3.

Krashen, S.D. (1988). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Prentice-Hall International.

Kuhh, M. & Stahl, S. (2016). Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. http://www.ciera.org/library/reports/Inquiry-2/2-008.htm1.

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). Teaching grammar in Celes-Murcia's teaching English as a second language. Singapore: Thomson Learning Asia.

Murcia, M.C. & Freeman, D. (2008). The grammar book. Singapore: Thomson Learning Asia.

Nam, I. (2006). An analysis of English majors needs at a Korean University. Seoul, Korea: The Korea TESOL Journal.

Nunan, D. & Bailey, C.M. (2009). Exploring second Language classroom research. Canada: Nelson Education Ltd.

Nunan, D. (2009). Second Language Teaching and Learning. University of Hong Kong: Cengage Learning Asia Pte Ltd.

Palmer, A. (2012). Communication practice vs. pattern practice. USA: ELT Forum. 50.4

Shanklin, M.T. (2003). The communication and grammar proficiency.

Spada, N. (1993). Form-focused instruction and second language acquisition: A review of classroom and laboratory research. Language Teaching, 30(2).

Spada, N. (2007). Communicative Language Teaching: Current Status and future prospects. International Handbook of ELT. 1.

Stathis, R. A. (2013). Grammar Gallery: The Research Basis. Ruidoso NM: The Teacher Writing Center. Retrieved from: http://www.teacherwritingcenter.org/explicitgrammarpaperfinal.pdf.

Swain, M. (1998). Focus on form through conscious reflection. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second Language acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.