The relationship between students' learning styles and teachers' teaching styles to students' achievement
Main Article Content
Keywords
Students' Learning Style, Teachers' Teaching Style, Students' Achievement, Preferred Learning Styles, Preferred Teaching Styles
Abstract
This descriptive study utilizing a One-Shot Survey Questionnaire Method was conducted to determine the relationship between students' learning styles and teachers' teaching styles to students' achievement. The study revealed that the preferred learning style of students is Auditory while the teachers preferred the Facilitator Model Type of teaching. It was also found out that the achievement level of the student respondents for the second and third quarters of the academic year is good. Moreover, there was a significant difference between the learning styles of students and the teaching styles of teachers. Lastly, the result revealed that there was no significant relationship between the learning styles of students and their academic achievement while there was a significant relationship in the teaching styles of teachers to students' achievement.
References
Acero, V.O. (2000). Principles and Strategies of Teaching. Quezon City: Rex Book Store, Inc.
Bandler, R and J. Grinder. (2006). Understanding Learning Styles. Retrieved from http://www.tss.vouge/ph.ca/resources/idres/packagels.html
Brown, B.L. (2003). Teaching Style vs. Learning style. Retrieved from http://www.calproonline.org/eric/docs/mr41.pdf
Efiong, E. A. (2005). Relationship between teachers' teaching methods and the pupils learning styles: A case study of some primary schools in Zaria and Soba local government in Kudana State. Retrieved from http://www.tiger,towson.edu/-/hemmiz/research.html
Garrote, N. (1999). Preferred learning styles of fourth year high school students in the central area of the division of Negros occidental: their academic grades and performance in the National Achievement Test (NSAT). Unpublished Master's Thesis, UNO- R.
Lage, et. al. (2000). The best choice according to experts. Retrieved from http://tlt.its.psv.edu/suggetsions/research/teachingstyles
Mallen, R. (2001). What teaching methods and activities suit different learning styles? Retrieved from http://tlt.its.psu.edu/suggestions/research/teaching_styles.shtm
Mayer, R. A. (2002). The Promise of Educational Psychology. New Jersy: Pearson Education, Inc.
Norland, et.al.(2002). Myths and Realities about learning and teaching styles. Retrieved from http://www.cete.org/acve/docgen.asp?tbl=mr&ID=117
Bandler, R and J. Grinder. (2006). Understanding Learning Styles. Retrieved from http://www.tss.vouge/ph.ca/resources/idres/packagels.html
Brown, B.L. (2003). Teaching Style vs. Learning style. Retrieved from http://www.calproonline.org/eric/docs/mr41.pdf
Efiong, E. A. (2005). Relationship between teachers' teaching methods and the pupils learning styles: A case study of some primary schools in Zaria and Soba local government in Kudana State. Retrieved from http://www.tiger,towson.edu/-/hemmiz/research.html
Garrote, N. (1999). Preferred learning styles of fourth year high school students in the central area of the division of Negros occidental: their academic grades and performance in the National Achievement Test (NSAT). Unpublished Master's Thesis, UNO- R.
Lage, et. al. (2000). The best choice according to experts. Retrieved from http://tlt.its.psv.edu/suggetsions/research/teachingstyles
Mallen, R. (2001). What teaching methods and activities suit different learning styles? Retrieved from http://tlt.its.psu.edu/suggestions/research/teaching_styles.shtm
Mayer, R. A. (2002). The Promise of Educational Psychology. New Jersy: Pearson Education, Inc.
Norland, et.al.(2002). Myths and Realities about learning and teaching styles. Retrieved from http://www.cete.org/acve/docgen.asp?tbl=mr&ID=117
Article Sidebar
Published
Nov 21, 2015
Article Details
How to Cite
Caraballe, M. R. S. (2015). The relationship between students’ learning styles and teachers’ teaching styles to students’ achievement. Asia Pacific Higher Education Research Journal (APHERJ), 2(2). https://doi.org/10.56278/apherj.v2i2.105
Section
Research Article